|
Statins Update: Part II
by Jim English
After a drug has been approved for widespread
clinical use to treat one condition, clinicians and patients often
report that the drug also has surprising and unanticipated effects
on other health conditions. Aspirin is a prime example of just such
a drug. Introduced as an analgesic in 1897, over the next century
aspirin was found to possess a host of health benefits — reducing
inflammation, inhibiting blood clotting and lowering risk of heart
attack. A recent finding is that statins, a family of powerful cholesterol-lowering
compounds, are turning out to deliver an unexpectedly broad range
of health benefits.
Statins (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A [HMG CoA] reductase
inhibitors) are potent cholesterol-lowering substances that have
proven to be extremely effective at lowering LDL levels and reducing
risk of heart attacks and strokes. Synthetic HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor
drugs currently prescribed to lower cholesterol levels include fluvastatin
(Lescol®), cerivastatin (Baycol®), atorvastatin (Lipitor®),
simvastatin (Zocor®), pravastatin (Pravachol®) and lovastatin
(Mevacor®). In addition to these expensive synthetic statin
drugs, lovastatin also occurs naturally as a food product called
red yeast rice extract.
A growing number of studies are now beginning
to reveal unanticipated benefits from the statins. In the previous
article (“Breaking
Research on Health Benefits of Statins") we reported that
statins have been shown to lower incidence of Alzheimer's disease
by up to 73 percent, as compared to patients using other medications
for hypertension or cardiovascular disease.1 Furthermore, recent
data from the Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study (HERS)
reports that women taking statins have a 50% lower risk of venous
thrombosis than nonusers.2
Additional research on statins suggest that they
can also:
- Modify endothelial function,
- Control inflammatory responses,
- Promote plaque stability,
- Inhibit thrombus formation,
- Reduce platelet aggregation
- Increase collagen and smooth muscle cells
- Mitigate plaque disruption
- Maintain a favorable balance between prothrombotic
and fibrinolytic mechanisms.3
In this article we continue our examination of
the growing list of health benefits of statins by reviewing research
on their potential for reducing the risk of bone fractures in the
elderly.
Osteoporosis is a major public health threat for more than 28 million
Americans, 80 percent of whom are women. In the U.S. today, 10 million
individuals already have the disease and 18 million more have low
bone mass, placing them at increased risk for osteoporosis.4
Healthy bone mass and density result when the
body maintains a delicate balance between the breaking down and
absorbing of old bone (resorption) and formation of healthy new
bone. Osteoporosis (porous bone) is a metabolic bone disease that
upsets this homeostasis, resulting in the structural deterioration
of bone tissue and a loss of bone mass. This imbalance contributes
to bone fragility and an increased susceptibility to fractures,
particularly of the hip, spine and wrist. Fractures of the hip frequently
require hospitalization and surgery, and can lead to permanent disability
and death. Spinal or vertebral fractures, while not life-threatening,
have serious consequences, including loss of height, severe back
pain, and deformity.
All currently available, approved therapies for
osteoporosis work by inhibiting the normal breakdown and resorption
of bone. Such antiresorptive therapies include Calcitonin (a hormone
that decreases bone resorption), estrogen replacement therapy (pairing
estrogen with progesterone), selective estrogen receptor modulators
(Raloxifene), and bisphosphonates (alendronate sodium and risedronate
sodium). By inhibiting the resorption phase of the bone remodeling
cycle, these therapies, while unable to increase bone mass, have
been shown to improve bone mineral density and modestly reduce the
risk of new fractures.5
While inhibiting bone resorption offers therapeutic treatment for
osteoporosis, it cannot repair existing skeletal damage. Anabolic
therapy, utilizing agents to directly stimulate new bone growth,
may potentially be a more effective approach, especially if used
in conjunction with current antiresorptive therapies.
Early efforts to stimulate skeletal anabolic growth
have been disappointing. Sodium fluoride was initially shown to
increase bone mass, and observational studies suggested some reduction
in risk of vertebral fracture.6 When researchers conducted a randomized
trial they discovered that, while sodium fluoride did increase spine
bone density, it also stimulated the formation of abnormal bone.
Not only did sodium fluoride fail to reduce the risk of vertebral
fractures, it actually increased the risk of peripheral fractures.7
Research into other therapies to encourage the
formation of new bone growth continues. Promising candidates include
selective androgen receptor modulators, parathyroid hormone analogs,
oxytocin analogs, and statins. Of these, statins have received attention
based on their ability to exhibit anabolic effects in the skeleton,
and encourage the formation of new bone growth.8
The discovery that statins promote new bone growth was the result
of a deliberate search for a chemical called bone morphogenic protein
2, a natural growth factor that causes osteoblasts to proliferate,
mature, and form new bone. After screening thousands of candidate
chemicals, the researchers found that two statin drugs, lovastatin
and simvastatin, formed new cortical bone in mice in following five
days of subcutaneous injections. When the researchers fed lovastatin
and simvastatin to mice orally, they found that trabecular bone
volume increased by 90%.9 Importantly, early observations suggests
that the new bone stimulated by statins appears normal.10
Spurred on by the success of animal studies showing that statins
increased bone formation, volume, and density, researchers began
to look for evidence that these agents could reduce bone fractures
in humans. In one case-controlled study, researchers examined ten
years worth of patient records, gathered from some 300 general medical
practice clinics in England. After analyzing data on 91,611 patients
aged 50 years or older, including 28,340 individuals taking lipid-lowering
drugs, the researchers reported finding a large and statistically
significant reduction in fractures among patients taking statins,
with a 45% lower risk of all types of fractures and 88% lower risk
of hip fractures.11
These findings were supported when a second team
of researchers conducted a case-control study involving 6,110 New
Jersey residents, aged 65 years or older. The researchers found
that the risk of hip fractures decreased with increasing statin
use during the previous three years, resulting in a 43% to 50% lower
risk of hip fractures in statin users vs. nonusers of statins. In
their report the authors state, “Clear relationships were
observed between the degree of reduction in hip fracture risk and
the extent of statin use.”12
This was followed by reports of significant increases
in bone-mineral density in postmenopausal women taking statins.13
Based on these early observational studies researchers found that
women and men taking statins had a substantially lower risk of fractures
and higher bone densities than those who were not taking statins.
As is often the case with new research, two follow-up studies published
in the April 11, 2001 issue of JAMA failed to find evidence to support
the use of statins for reducing fractures. In one study designed
to assess whether statins have clinically significant effects on
bone, researchers in New Zealand randomly assigned pravastatin or
placebo to 9,014 patients. After six years of follow up the researchers
reported finding no significant effect on fracture risk.14 In a
second study researchers in England compared 81,880 patients, aged
50 years or older who had suffered a fracture against 81,880 matched
controls. Again, researchers concluded that they found little reduction
in fractures when statins were used in dosages prescribed in the
study.15
In the latest study, presented to scientists attending the June
11, 2001 joint meeting of the International Bone and Mineral Society
and the European Calcified Tissue Society in Madrid, Spain, researchers
report that statins do seem to have a protective effect against
hip and non-spine fractures.16
Dr. Douglas C. Bauer of the University of California
at San Francisco reported that the findings of the meta-analysis
confirm the results of some, but not all, recent observational studies,
stating, “The sum total of evidence favors the protective
effects of this type of medication.”
Dr. Bauer and colleagues assessed statin use and
fracture risk after conducting a meta-analysis of eight observational
studies. The studies analyzed risks of hip fracture in a total of
151,500 individuals, and risks of non-spine fracture in a total
of 57,621 individuals.
The researchers found “a 57% reduction in
hip fractures and a 34% reduction in non-spine fractures among statin
users,” according to Dr. Bauer.
Dr. Bauer added that six of the eight studies
included the use of non-statin lipid-lowering medications, which
showed no protective effect against fractures. When the researchers
analyzed the findings with and without data from the Women's Health
Initiative they found “very similar results in the protective
effect of statins.”
A rapidly growing body of research is revealing a wide range of
unanticipated benefits from cholesterol-lowering statins, including
lowering incidence of Alzheimer's disease by up to 73%, and lowering
risk of venous thrombosis by up 50%. New research now supports earlier
findings that statin users benefit from reduction in hip fractures
non-spine fractures.
As previously reported, red yeast rice extract,
a natural source of lova-statin, has been proven effective in a
number of clinical trials for promoting healthy cholesterol levels.
Lovastatin, the main active ingredient in red yeast rice, has been
extensively researched and found to be extremely effective at lowering
LDL levels and reducing risk of heart attack and strokes. These
results lend credible support for the efficacy of red yeast rice
in maintaining a healthy cardiovascular system.
Red yeast has been proven as effective as pharmaceutical
statin drugs, such as Mevacor, but at about one-fifth the cost,
and is available without a prescription. The additional findings
of a benefit in the reduction of fracture incidence and increased
bone density further support the role of red yeast rice extract
in a nutritional regimen.
Since red yeast rice extract may reduce tissue
CoQ10 levels, it is recommended to take additional CoQ10 when red
yeast rice extract or statin drugs are taken.
Abstract
Davignon J, Mabile L. Ann Endocrinol
(Paris) 2001 Feb;62(1 Pt 2):101-12.
This brief review and update considers a
few aspects of the mechanisms of action of statins, especially
those related to some of the pleiotropic effects that have
clinical relevance. The beneficial effect on endothelial dysfunction
is a class effect that is related not only to the lowering
of plasma LDL-cholesterol but also to a direct effect on nitric
oxide (NO) production. It is an early and sustained effect,
linked to oxidative processes, that deserves particular attention
since endothelial dysfunction is intimately linked to atherogenesis.
Awareness of the anti-inflammatory effect came about following
the observation that statin administration in humans reduces
markers of inflammation in the circulation. The importance
of these observations is ascribable to the fact that atherosclerosis
is an inflammatory disease, that the inflammatory process
in a coronary artery is now measurable in vivo in humans,
that it contributes to the progression and the destabilization
of the plaque, and also, because statins exert a number of
effects that tend to stabilize it. Statins, and particularly
lipophilic statins, in general inhibit cell proliferation,
seemingly by multifaceted mechanisms. These include inhibition
of cell cycle progression, induction of apoptosis, reduction
of cyclooxygenase-2 activity and an enhancement of angiogenesis.
This effect has been used to show that statins are anticarcinogenic
in vitro and in animals. The clinical relevance of such a
property remains to be proven but is supported by promising
observations in animals and in humans which are detailed in
this review. Finally, the ability of lipophilic statins to
increase the production of bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2),
and to enhance osteogenesis in animals combined with the results
of several clinical studies should stimulate physicians to
seriously consider an eventual indication of statins for the
treatment of osteoporosis. |
References
1. Fassbender K, Simons M, Bergmann C,
Stroick M, Lutjohann D, Keller P, Runz H, Kuhl S, Bertsch T, von
Bergmann K, Hennerici M, Beyreuther K, Hartmann T. Simvastatin strongly
reduces levels of Alzheimer’s disease beta-amyloid peptides
Abeta 42 and Abeta 40 in vitro and in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
2001 Apr 10.
2.Grady D, Wenger NK, Herrington D, et al. Postmenopausal hormone
therapy increases risk for venous thromboembolic disease: the Heart
and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:689-696.
3.Robert S. Rosenson, MD; Christine C. Tangney, PhD. Antiatherothrombotic
Properties of Statins Implications for Cardiovascular Event Reduction.
JAMA. 1998;279:1643-1650.
4.National Osteoporosis Foundation Fact Sheet; www.nof.org/osteoporosis/index.htm).
5.Rosen CJ, Bilezikian JP. Halting Bone Loss. J Clin Endocrinol
Metab 2001 Mar;86(3):957-64).
6. Riggs BL, Seeman E, Hodgson SF, et al. Effect of the fluoride/calcium
regimen on vertebral fracture occurrence in postmenopausal women
with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 1990;322:802-809.
7. Riggs BL, Hodgson SF, O'Fallon WM, et al. Effect of fluoride
treatment on the fracture rate in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.
N Engl J Med. 1982;306:446-450.8. Lopez FJ.. New approaches to the
treatment of osteoporosis. 5: Curr Opin Chem Biol 2000 Aug;4(4):383-93)
9. Mundy G, Garrett R, Harris S, et al. Stimulation of bone formation
in vitro and in rodents by statins. Science. 1999;286:1946-1949)
10. Gregory R. Mundy, MD, written communication, May 2000.
11. Meier CR, Schlienger RG, Kraenzlin ME, Schlegel B, Jick H. HMG-CoA
reductase inhibitors and the risk of fractures. JAMA. 2000;283:3205-3210.
12. Philip S. Wang, MD, Daniel H. Solomon, MD, Helen Mogun, MS;
Jerry Avorn, MD. MG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors and the Risk of Hip
Fractures in Elderly Patients. JAMA. 2000;283:3211-3216)
13. Edwards CJ, Hart DJ, Spector TD. Oral statins and increased
bone-mineral density in postmenopausal women. Lancet 2000 Jun 24;355(9222):2218-9)
14. Reid IR, Hague W, Emberson J, Baker J, Tonkin A, Hunt D, MacMahon
S, Sharpe N. Effect of pravastatin on frequency of fracture in the
LIPID study: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.
Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease. Lancet
2001 Feb 17;357(9255):509-12)
15.Tjeerd-Pieter van Staa, MD. Sebastiaan Wegman, BSc; Frank de
Vries, BSc; Bert Leufkens, PhD; Cyrus Cooper, MA. Use of statins
and risk of fractures. JAMA. 2001;285:1850-1855).
16. Meta-Analysis Supports Protective Effect of Statins Against
Certain Fractures. http://www.reutershealth.com/ archive/2001/06/13/professional/links/20010613clin022.html. |